Trump\'s Second Term: 100 Days of Executive Action

---

Day 1: The Executive Order Blitz

On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump signed 26 executive orders — a record for a single inaugural day in American presidential history. The previous high was nine, set by Trump himself in 2017. The Day 1 orders covered an extraordinary range of policy: withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement (for the second time), withdrawal from the World Health Organization, termination of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs across the federal government, a declaration of a national emergency at the southern border, reinstatement of the "Remain in Mexico" policy for asylum seekers, and the reversal of dozens of Biden administration orders on climate, housing, and student loans. The sheer volume was intended to signal velocity — a second term designed to move faster and with more preparation than the first.

The legal architecture of the Day 1 orders was more sophisticated than in 2017. The first Trump administration repeatedly lost early court battles because executive orders were drafted quickly by a small team with limited legal review. The second term's legal team, drawing on preparations made by the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 framework and supplemented by the new White House counsel office, built more legally defensible language into the orders. This did not prevent court challenges — multiple federal district courts issued temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions against specific EOs within the first weeks — but the administration's legal defense was more organized and better resourced.

International Withdrawals: Paris, WHO, UNESCO

The withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, UNESCO, and the WHO followed a pattern established in the first term: rapid disengagement from multilateral bodies and agreements that the administration characterized as unfavorable to American interests or sovereignty. The Paris withdrawal took effect after a required one-year notice period — leaving the US as the only major economy outside the accord. The WHO withdrawal began immediately, with the administration halting US funding payments and initiating the formal withdrawal process. American representatives were recalled from WHO governing bodies. The practical consequence is that the US has reduced its voice in global health policy precisely as the world continues to manage post-pandemic surveillance infrastructure.

Tariff Escalation: The Timeline

Trump's second term tariff agenda moved faster and further than the first. A 10% baseline tariff on all imports was announced in February 2025 and took effect in March. This was followed by a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports (no country exemptions), a 25% tariff on all Canadian and Mexican goods (citing border security), and escalating tariffs on Chinese goods reaching 145% on certain categories by Q2 2025. The EU responded with retaliatory tariffs on American agricultural products and consumer goods. Consumer prices in the US, particularly for electronics, automobiles, and appliances, rose measurably through Q3 and Q4 2025. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index fell to its lowest level since 2020 by January 2026.

DOGE: Federal Workforce Cuts

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory body chaired by Elon Musk operating outside the formal cabinet structure, emerged as one of the most disruptive elements of Trump's second term. DOGE targeted the federal civilian workforce of approximately 3 million employees with a combination of voluntary separation buyouts ("deferred resignation" programs), reductions in force (RIFs), and the elimination of entire agency functions. USAID was the highest-profile casualty: its overseas programs were gutted and hundreds of career staff were dismissed. The Department of Education, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and National Public Radio (NPR) faced similar assaults. Musk publicly claimed cumulative savings of over $100 billion, though independent budget analysts at the Congressional Budget Office and CRFB disputed both the methodology and the arithmetic behind those figures.

Federal courts intervened repeatedly. Multiple district court judges issued injunctions blocking specific DOGE actions, ruling that unilateral workforce reductions of this kind require Congressional authorization. The Ninth Circuit and the DC Circuit Court of Appeals both upheld lower court injunctions in early 2026. The legal battle over DOGE's scope and authority is likely to reach the Supreme Court, but the immediate operational impact on federal agencies was substantial regardless: institutional knowledge left with departing staff, service delivery degraded in several agencies, and union contracts were violated in ways that generated separate litigation.

Immigration: The Enforcement Surge

Immigration enforcement was the most visible and operationally intensive element of Trump's first 100 days. ICE conducted large-scale workplace and neighborhood raids in dozens of cities, with military transport aircraft used for deportation flights — a visible signal of scale and intent. The administration declared a national emergency at the southern border, invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to permit expedited deportations without standard immigration court proceedings. Monthly deportation figures in February and March 2025 reached levels not seen since the Obama administration's peak enforcement years of 2011-2013. The administration also moved to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, an action immediately blocked by federal courts as inconsistent with the 14th Amendment.

Approval Rating Trajectory

Trump began his second term with an approval rating of approximately 47% — considerably stronger than his first-term start and reflecting the political momentum of his 2024 victory. The trajectory since then has been consistently downward. By April 2025, approval had fallen to 43% as tariff impacts began appearing in consumer prices. By July 2025 it stood at 41%. By January 2026, 40%. As of April 2026 — the 100-day mark — it sits at 39%, the lowest ever recorded for a president at this stage of a term. The decline tracks closely with consumer confidence and is particularly sharp among independents and suburban voters, two groups that provided margin for his 2024 victory.

The historical lesson from first terms gone wrong is that approval ratings can recover, but they rarely do so dramatically when the economic signals remain negative. The tariff impact on prices is structural and slow to reverse. The DOGE cuts created real-world disruption that voters experiencing it are unlikely to forget by November. The immigration enforcement surge plays well with the base but not with the persuadable middle. For now, the 100-day data tells a clear story: this is the weakest opening stretch any president has posted since the modern polling era began — and the structural outlook for 2026 reflects it.