Americans broadly believe Silicon Valley has accumulated too much power. The Google antitrust ruling, TikTok’s continuing saga, and the explosive growth of AI have all intensified public demand for oversight. At 68%, concern about big tech power is one of the most bipartisan positions in current polling — and yet Congress has consistently failed to act.
The Bipartisan Case Against Big Tech
Tech regulation is unusual in American politics: both parties are increasingly critical of large technology companies, but for different reasons. Democrats focus on data privacy, algorithmic harms, content moderation failures, and the suppression of competitive small businesses. Republicans focus on perceived censorship of conservative viewpoints, Section 230 liability protections, TikTok’s Chinese ownership, and the concentration of economic power in a small number of coastal companies that they believe lean ideologically left.
The 2025 Gallup survey finding 68% of Americans believe big tech has too much power shows 72% of Democrats and 64% of Republicans agreeing — a narrow partisan gap unusual in contemporary American polling. This convergence in public opinion has not yet translated into major federal legislation, largely because tech companies spend heavily on lobbying, the two parties’ diagnoses of the problem differ, and the technical complexity of the legislation makes compromise difficult.
| Question | Overall | Dem | Rep | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big tech has too much power | 68% | 72% | 64% | Gallup 2025 |
| Require AI disclosure labels | 71% | 76% | 66% | Pew Research 2025 |
| Support AI safety regulation | 67% | 73% | 60% | Pew Research 2025 |
| Social media harms children | 79% | 80% | 78% | AP-NORC 2025 |
| Support federal data privacy law | 74% | 79% | 69% | Gallup 2025 |
Google Antitrust: What the Court Found
In August 2024, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google had illegally maintained its monopoly in the general search market. The ruling found that Google’s payments to Apple, Samsung, and other device and browser manufacturers — totaling approximately $26 billion in 2021 alone — constituted exclusive dealing arrangements that foreclosed rivals like Bing and DuckDuckGo from the distribution channels they needed to build competitive scale.
The remedies phase of the case, which could include behavioral restrictions on Google’s distribution agreements or structural remedies including forced divestiture, was ongoing as of early 2026. The case has significant public visibility — Google touches the daily lives of virtually every American — and polling shows 63% of Americans believe the federal government should break up or impose significant restrictions on Google’s search dominance.
AI Governance: The New Bipartisan Tech Battleground
Artificial intelligence governance has emerged as one of the few technology policy areas with genuine bipartisan legislative energy. The concern is unusual: it comes from both directions simultaneously. Progressives worry about AI bias, job displacement, facial recognition abuses, and the erosion of privacy. Conservatives worry about AI-generated disinformation, the concentration of AI development in ideologically progressive companies, and national security implications of Chinese AI development.
Pew Research’s 2025 AI Attitudes survey found 71% support for requiring AI disclosure on synthetic content, and 67% support for government regulation to prevent AI harms — with relatively narrow partisan gaps. In the 2026 cycle, AI governance is likely to be a secondary issue overshadowed by economic concerns, but it provides a rare opportunity for bipartisan legislation in an era of nearly zero cross-party cooperation.
We use cookies for analytics and functionality. Learn more