Who Actually Runs the Government? The Cabinet, Civil Service, and the DOGE Overhaul
The president sets policy. The cabinet leads agencies. But 2.2 million career civil servants actually run the government. The differenc-light);font-size:1rem;max-width:640px;margin:0 0 8px;"> The president sets policy. The cabinet leads agencies. But 2.2 million career civil servants actually run the government. The difference between political appointees and career staff — and the effort to shift that balance through DOGE and Schedule F — is one of the most consequential governance fights of the Trump second term.
- The US has 2.2 million career civil servants and only ~4,000 political appointees — career staff actually operate the government across administrations, providing continuity and institutional expertise
- Schedule F, reinstated by Trump in January 2025, reclassifies policy-adjacent career employees as at-will — removing civil service protections and making political purges easier
- DOGE drove significant workforce reductions through a combination of Schedule F, reduction-in-force procedures, and "deferred resignation" buyouts — multiple courts found specific firings unlawful
- The 450+ federal agencies collectively manage a $6.5 trillion annual budget — the career workforce is what translates policy directives into actual government functions
The Three Layers of Federal Executive Power
The president is the constitutional head of the executive branch. The Cabinet consists of the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments (State, Treasury, Defense, Justice, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, HHS, HUD, Transportation, Energy, Education, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security). Cabinet secretaries set policy direction and manage their departments, but they cannot do so without the operational capacity of the career workforce below them. Cabinet secretaries serve at the pleasure of the president; they can be removed at any time.
Below cabinet secretaries are layers of political appointees: deputy secretaries, undersecretaries, assistant secretaries, and Schedule C (non-competitive) positions. Approximately 4,000 political appointees serve across the executive branch; roughly 1,200 of these positions require Senate confirmation. These appointees handle the translation of presidential policy into agency operations, manage regulatory processes, and supervise career staff. A president often struggles to fill all 4,000 positions; vacancies leave career staff in acting roles. The Trump administration took longer than most to fill positions in the first term; the second term has moved faster.
The 2.2 million career civilian employees are the operational core of the federal government. They are hired through competitive merit-based processes, hold protected positions under civil service law, and continue across administrations regardless of which party holds the White House. The civil service provides institutional memory, technical expertise, and operational continuity. Career employees include IRS agents, VA doctors, FDA scientists, military logisticians, FEMA emergency managers, EPA environmental engineers, and thousands of other specialists. The civil service was created by the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883 to end the patronage system where government jobs were given as political rewards.
Major Federal Agencies and What They Do
| Agency | Core Function | Employees | 2025-2026 DOGE Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dept. of Defense | Military; largest federal employer | ~750K civilian | Some contract cuts; mostly intact |
| Dept. of Veterans Affairs | VA hospitals, benefits, services | ~400K | Staff cuts raised concerns about care wait times |
| Social Security Admin. | Social Security, SSI payments | ~60K | DOGE embedded; processing delays reported |
| IRS (Treasury) | Tax collection, enforcement, refunds | ~80K (pre-cut) | ~6,000 fired; major enforcement reduction |
| USPS | Postal service (semi-independent) | ~640K | Largely separate; ongoing restructuring |
| Dept. of Education | Federal education funding, loans | ~4,000 | Targeted for elimination; legally complex |
| EPA | Environmental regulation, enforcement | ~15K | Significant staff cuts; regulatory rollback |
| USAID (State) | Foreign aid and development | ~10K | Attempted shutdown; courts blocked some cuts |
| CFPB | Consumer financial protection | ~1,700 | Director fired; operations suspended then partially restored |
DOGE, Schedule F, and “Draining the Swamp”
The core premise of the Trump second term’s personnel strategy is that the career civil service is not neutral — that it is populated by left-leaning employees who resist Republican policy priorities through bureaucratic inertia, slow-walking of regulations, and institutional loyalty to the pre-Trump status quo. This is the political theory behind “draining the swamp.”
The operational tool for acting on this theory is Schedule F, reinstated in January 2025. Schedule F reclassifies career employees in policy-related positions as Schedule F employees without standard civil service protections, making them removable at will like political appointees. The estimated number of positions potentially subject to reclassification ranges from 50,000 to as many as several hundred thousand, depending on how broadly “policy-related” is defined.
DOGE has supplemented Schedule F with mass layoffs conducted as Reductions in Force (RIF), which require agency-by-agency compliance with notice and placement requirements, and with deferred resignation programs that offered federal employees a buyout to leave voluntarily. Courts have issued injunctions blocking some of these personnel actions, finding they violated civil service statutes and in some cases constitutional due process requirements.
The complexity of “draining the swamp”: Federal agencies do not simply execute political instructions. Many of them operate under complex statutory mandates that require specific processes, consultation procedures, rulemaking requirements, and environmental review obligations. An agency with 20% fewer staff does not produce 80% of its previous output — it produces less, and some of what it was required by law to do goes undone. Courts can order agencies to comply with statutory obligations; staffing cuts do not change the legal requirements.
Related Analysis
What Is DOGE?
The Department of Government Efficiency: legal status, what it has actually done, and court challenges.
What Is the IRS?
IRS explained: tax collection, audits, DOGE cuts and the impact on refunds.
DOGE Impact on States 2026
How federal workforce cuts are affecting states and communities across the country.
Stay ahead of the polls
Weekly updates: Generic Ballot, Trump Approval, 2026 race forecasts. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Double opt-in. GDPR-compliant. Unsubscribe any time.
We use cookies for analytics and functionality. Learn more